Skip to content

2

**Originally posted July 5, 2009**

Okay, get your mind off of all the weirdness of MJ's latter years.  As for the criminal charges, don't go there.  Think about the music and the performances.  Get yourself in that mind space.  Maybe it'll help if you squeal "Ooh" and "I'm Bad" three or four times.  Okay, focused now? 

 His death was tragic. Having a creative force like his snuffed out so quickly, so needlessly has deprived the world of years of music and magic.  So while it's certainly his tragedy, his family's tragedy, it's also a loss for everyone who ever turned on a radio or downloaded music.  In the wake of the sudden loss there were many retrospectives and tributes.

As one of those tributes Fox re-broadcast the first American Idol finalist show of this season featuring the top 13 performing Michael Jackson songs.  I watch American Idol and enjoy seeing the group working and growing into music professionals.  It's always fun to see someone working to make their dream come true.  But I'd forgotten about that MJ show because, at the time, it was just another show.  Too bad it wasn't done later in the season with the gloved one giving the finalists performance critiques and suggestions. 

My favorite contestant of this past season was Adam Lambert.  We all recall that he finished second.  My only explanation for that is that Kris Allen was everyman -- the one more like the average American watching on the sofa at home.  Adam has too much creative force to be contained or labeled in any one genre or tradition.  Adam will never be anyone's everyman -- but neither is Elton John and, of course, neither was Michael Jackson. 

As one of the last performances of the show, Adam Lambert did MJ's "Black or White."  Adam nailed it, standing out from the others like Sir Elton at a High School talent contest.  His performance impressed the judges too, including Simon Cowell, the one we love to hate and hate to love.  Simon's comments made me think and inspired this post.  Simon said Adam nailed it because (and I'm paraphrasing here because I didn't watch the episode with pen in hand) - To make a MJ song work , a performer has to be totally comfortable on stage, and he has to perform the song like Michael - over the top.

Why did that resonate with me? When Adam and MJ perform, they do it over the top.  When I write romance, I write it over the top.  For a writer or performer to succeed, he or she has to do it the way it comes naturally.  If Kris Allen tried to perform MJ over the top, it wouldn't work for him at all.  It worked for Lambert because that's how his art speaks to him.  It's the same for a romance novelist.  You can only write romance over the top and have it carry the reader along if that's how the story and the characters speak to the writer.  I understand MJ's approach to music because I know it must have come as naturally to him as my stories come to me. 

...continue reading "If Michael Jackson Wrote Romance Novels"

Okay, America, I can now reveal a closely guarded secret. Santa's name is John.

No? You disagree? Well, maybe John is just MY SANTA. Come to think about it, he is my Santa. And he rocks it big style. So ladies (especially you redheads out there - you know who you are) hands off. In addition to my hubby's myriad and too numerous to list other amazing qualities (in addition to putting up with me), he's a smart and generous man who got me an e-reader for Christmas.

On Christmas morning, my hubby handed me my gifts in a very specific order. First up, I unwrapped an organizer for all those knives, forks and spoons that have been wadded up and tossed randomly in a drawer for years. Then he handed me a box containing a Hamilton Beach Brewstation Coffeemaker to replace ours that died a few months ago.  (As a rambling aside, I'll note that the Brewstation is a temperamental machine with a shorter lifespan than other models. But I forgive it and will replace each Brewstation with another because nobody in the price range comes close for quality and convenience).

When John handed me the first box, with the drawer organizer, he said it would make me smile. It did, because after over 20 years of marriage, he knows full well my rule that Christmas gifts should cater to wishes and wants rather than needs and necessities. I've ranted often enough to him about my ire for men who present their wives something like a vacuum cleaner as a Christmas gift. I'd hope that wives who receive something like that got their hubbys a set of pots and pans because they'd get the same hurt, lost expression when the gift got open. Men of America, your wife may clean and manage your household but listen to me very closely - your wife is not your house.

So the first gift, the organizer, was a "gag" gift of a sort. My hubby is a smart man with a sharp sense of humor and he could be a comic for a living if he didn't have a family dragging him down and grounding him. The coffeemaker was a better gift, although it still catered to need rather than want -- I consider coffee to be necessary for survival. Both the first two packages were very big. The third package was smaller, much, much smaller. And ladies, don't we know that the best holiday gifts come in the small packages?

...continue reading "Did Santa Bring You An E-Reader Too?"

***Note - My blog has just been added to my Author Central page at Amazon. To acquaint readers there with my work, I'm posting some prior entries.  Also, it's the holidays, people.  All that peace on earth stuff is stressful and don't get me started on the goodwill part.  ****

(Originally posted May 31, 2009)

Drum roll, please! I got an actual customer review on Amazon. 

 A reader gave a brief review of A Faerie Fated Forever. She gave it 3 out of 5 stars, which ain’t bad.  Yeah, 5 out of 5 would’ve been nice but heck, I’m pretty darned new at this whole publication business.  Besides, what has me doing cartwheels isn’t the 3 stars.  It’s what she said about the book.

The reader titled her review Good Read Overall.  She said she started reading and didn’t put it down until the end, but thought there was a bit of over kill when he (Nial) finally decided he was in love.  First and foremost, I write to entertain.  When I pick up a book by one of my long time faves or by a new writer, I know it’s a success if I have trouble putting it down.  If I pick up one and read it straight through – well, that’s a home run.  Faerie entertained the reviewer.  That puts a big ole smile on my face.

The reviewer also said she thought there was a bit of “over kill” when Nial acknowledged that he’d fallen in love.  That comment only proves how smart this reviewer must be.  In Faerie as in ALL of my books, I write the love story over the top.  There’s a fair amount of tongue in cheek involved in this and it’s certainly not intended to reflect reality.  Anyone who has read this blog knows that I want my readers to escape reality.  And if you’re going to escape this reality, why not write one that women would like to inhabit? 

 My heroes are generally pretty spoiled guys.  Whether it’s in the contemporaries or the historicals, my heroes are rakes and rogues.  They’ve had too much their own way for too long and they’ve devoted a fair amount of energy to pleasure and self indulgence. When love strikes, it hits them hard but they won’t admit it.  They’re too stubborn, too certain that this is just another woman in a long train of women.  By the time they realize this one means much more, that this one matters, they’ve generally screwed up pretty badly.  Then they have to get her back, HAVE TO HAVE HER BACK, can’t live without her.  The race to redeem themselves and win her back is frantic and manic and yeah – totally over the top.  Over kill is a lot of fun to write and, judging from this review, it can be a lot of fun to read.

There’s also some justice that I believe women would like to see more of in the whole process.  Perhaps there’s even an element of Mother Nature’s karma -  You’ve had it way too easy, buddy.  You want this one?  You require this one?  You can’t exist without this one? Well good.  That’s as it should be.  But unlike the rest of your life up to this moment, it won’t be easy.  You’ll have to work to get her and you’ll have to struggle to keep her.  I can hear Mother Nature in my ear as I write, cheering on the heroine - You Go Girl.

I write over the top.  I write “over kill.”  I write stories where a great female karma shifts power to the ladies.   

So if you want to read a “slice of life” story that reflects the world we live in and work in and struggle to pay the bills in, well, my stories may not be your cup of latte.  But if you want to read about a place where men fall head over wonder worm in love, then pick up one of my books.  Heck, pick up all of my books.

The Amazon reviewer said she started reading Faerie and did not put it down until the end.  So the review essentially said that Faerie was an over the top love story that she couldn’t put down.  I like that.  I like it very, very much. 

Reader reviews and reaction are important to me.  Yeah, I’d like to be picked up by a big publishing house and have my books in stores around the globe.  Yeah, I’d love to have Shonda Rhimes, Ron Howard, Penny Marshall, Oprah Winfrey or the like call and say - Darling, I must buy the movie rights to your book.   One sale of movie rights would buy me a writer’s life.  Writing full time is the brass ring so many of us dream of reaching.

Most of us will never get the brass ring and it’s not why we write.  We write to intrigue, inform, enlighten or entertain.  For all of us, I couldn’t put it down is the ultimate reader’s compliment.  It’s why we turn on our computers and type Chapter One.  Having this reader say she didn’t put it down until the end means she enjoyed the book.  Having her call Nial’s reaction to falling in love “over kill” means she found it over the top. 

To me, the review means I succeeded at least once, with one reader.  Yeah, 5 out of 5 stars would have been nice.  But if I have a choice, I’ll take  “did not put it down until the end” over all the stars in the Amazon universe. 

Tracy Stuber, thanks for taking the time to comment on the book.  It meant a lot to me.  Guess what I’m trying to say is – Tracy Stuber, you rock!

THREE CHEERS FOR AMAZON!!!

I've given the company a hard time for its failure to clean out its Mobi closet, but people aren't perfect so I can hardly expect a company to achieve perfection.  Lord knows, I'm the poster child for flaws.  So I'm not saying that Amazon is perfect, but this week it took huge strides in becoming close enough to perfect for me.  Amazon just proved once again that it is the indie writer's best friend. 

This week, Amazon's indie writer's subsidiary, CreateSpace, entered the publishing biz.  CS has signed distribution deals with Ingram's Lightning Source and Baker & Taylor which will make books widely available to retailers and bookstores as well as to schools and libraries.  It's a big, big deal done quietly, almost under the radar. 

This quiet deal promises to change the face of publishing.   

Amazon first championed indie writers with its Kindle platform.  Yes, big publishers and major authors - if they're smart - publish on Kindle.  But the costs of such big named books brings big costs to Amazon as well.  There have been numerous stories speculating that the big e-tailer loses about $2 on each work of a Royal-published author that appears on Kindle.  Invariably those stories reach the flawed conclusion that the weight of these losses will drag down Kindle and Amazon.  Of course, the stories never mention the horde of indie work published on Kindle.

For each indie work, Amazon bears no up-front cost.  The writer sets the purchase price and Amazon collects 65% of that price for each book sold.   And more and more, buyers don't care whether the book has been vetted by a big publishing company.  Buyers want to decide for themselves and they're starting to hit the buy button more and more often for the indie works.  Each time an indie work sells, the e-tailer and the indie author profit. Big publishing shills cries of bankruptcy ahoy aside, I think Amazon is laughing all the way to the bank.  

What's the proof that Amazon is profitting from being the indie advocate?  Why, 'tis this week's new deal, of course.  Under the terms, any indie writer published on CS who purchases the pro-plan, at a cost of $39.00 per year, can enter their work in the new distribution channels.  And that's the best value out there for indie writers.

Often the cost factor will prevent authors from signing with Lightning Source or Baker & Taylor.  Those distributors require the writer to own the ISBN and then to pay a set up fee.  ISBNs are purchased in a block of 10 for somewhere between $250-$300.  Then there is a set up fee, of say $75, for each book.  That's too big a chunk of change for many indie writers, especially in this economy.  Lord knows, I blogged previously about my desire to get my books out there through LS. But in times when my family can't pay all its bills, laying out big bucks for distribution of books just wasn't happening.

So like many other indie writers, I was anticipating the day when I could get my work out there in the big, wide world.  On that day, my books could sit out there on store shelves beside works of romance authors like Julia Quinn, Johanna Lindsey, Catherine Coulter, Nora Roberts.  And my new books, the contemporaries where love and law intersect, they could one day sit beside John Grisham's work.  Heck, my last name (Graham) is even alphabetically close to his.  Well, thanks to Amazon, today is the future.

I was already published through CS and already enrolled in the pro-plan.  So Amazon made the path to my dream as easy as checking a box.  To other indie writers, I'd note that CS has no set up fees, they provide and own the ISBN, and the pro plan is only $39.00 per year.  For that price, you already got bigger royalties on Amazon.  Today, it also gives you the keys to the world.  Even I can afford $39.00 per year and my current economic balance sheets are as gloomy as anyone's. 

The move pits Amazon against the traditional publishing companies.  But it doesn't do it by attacking the walls of the Royal's castles.  Amazon has built a new castle and thrown open the gates.  It doesn't set up Amazon or CS as judge and jury.  The companies aren't screening works or deciding what Americans want.  Instead, they're banking on a future where Americans decide the next big thing for themselves, one purchase at a time. 

This move makes Amazon the Ellis Island for indie authors.  The company's Kindle success, fueled by profits made more from indies than the establishment, convinced the giant that the huddled masses did yearn to breathe free.  And in freedom, there is both choice and profit.  Our country was built on those principals and when it remembers that America is the country free enterprise built, happy days will return for everyone.  For now, at least Amazon has remembered.

Once again, traditional publishing's insular, short-sighted protectionism has brought the Royals a step closer to their own demise.  The companies could have seen the rise of devices like the Kindle as a low cost way to sell more books to more people.  The publishing Royals could have negotiated new  contracts with lower advance money and bigger writer royalties.  That would mean the writers shared not only the risk, but the reward as well.  But of course, publishers didn't do that.

Instead, the publishers closed ranks and circled the wagons.  They said, no big discounts to Amazon, never, not in a million years.  In fact, we're going to delay the release of new e-books so that we can bank bigger profits on our paper versions.  Take that, Amazon, they cried.

And Amazon took the publisher's sword and impaled them on it. 

So, book buyers everywhere, keep an eye on the shelves of your favorite bookstore, supermarket or drug store.  Within the next few weeks, if the owners of those stores and markets are smarter than the publishers, those shelves will bloom with books as wide and varied and different as the dreams and personalities of the shoppers. 

So once again, Amazon steps forward as the advocate for change and choice and the future.  Maybe an Amazon World wouldn't be such a bad place after all.

THREE CHEERS FOR AMAZON!!!

I've given the company a hard time for its failure to clean out its Mobi closet, but people aren't perfect so I can hardly expect a company to achieve perfection.  Lord knows, I'm the poster child for flaws.  So I'm not saying that Amazon is perfect, but this week it took huge strides in becoming close enough to perfect for me.  Amazon just proved once again that it is the indie writer's best friend. 

This week, Amazon's indie writer's subsidiary, CreateSpace, entered the publishing biz.  CS has signed distribution deals with Ingram's Lightning Source and Baker & Taylor which will make books widely available to retailers and bookstores as well as to schools and libraries.  It's a big, big deal done quietly, almost under the radar. 

This quiet deal promises to change the face of publishing.   

...continue reading "Amazon Attacks Again – There’s A New Publisher On The Block"

Men like to watch random people having sex. 

They'll pull up pictures of the act, watch one internet video after another showing a different set of people doing similar things.  A whole genre of movies exists to cater to the male desire to watch generously endowed females wiggle, squirm, slither and squeal in high-pitched tones as the man gives it to her good.  A few scenes later, the same man - we'll call him Dick - gives it to three different women (at the same time) and they enjoy it every bit as much as the first piece he left behind. 

Women like to read about how Dick discovers Jane - the woman who makes everything in the bedroom so different that he'll change the way he lives after the orgasm's over. 

...continue reading "Dick Leapt Jane vs. Dick Kept Jane"

1

It looks like the Kindle will win the Christmas, 2009 E-War amongst the readers.  

From all reports, B&N's Nook has been selling well, but it looks like the company rushed the device to market before it had a good supply of the devices.  Nooks ordered now for Christmas gifts will arrive long after Santa's sleigh has returned to the North Pole.   Holiday sales do account for a large percentage of a retailer's sales.  Additionally, B&N likely felt that not getting its device out for the Yule season would mean the company surrendered the battle without fielding an army.  B&N didn't want to give Amazon more of an advantage than the company already had.

I haven't held a Nook, but I've held a Kindle.  The device is amazing.  It's like the keys to the kingdom for a life-long bookworm (like me).  The 3G wireless connection means a reader can order a new book anytime, anywhere.  No bookstore required.  And Amazon has had the device out for a couple of generations so it has had some time to work out those kinks.  My computer programmer hubby would, I think, always hesitate a couple of years before buying a Nook.  Hubby says that the first generation of a program is bound to have bugs that will get worked out later, and he doesn't like to play guinea pig.  (He also feels that if he writes a computer program that compiles on the first try that disaster looms ahead, but that's another story.) 

...continue reading "The Winner of Battle HoHo 09 May Lose The War"

This week one of the bigs broke ranks and insiders have gone postal. 

Harlequin, one of the biggest category romance publishers on the planet, announced a new publishing arm.  For a fee that varies by package, a writer can publish a book that Harlequin will distribute. The pay-to-play arm of the company was originally named "Harlequin Horizons."  All over the blogosphere, writer's associations went ballistic.  RWA, Romance Writers of America, issued a special announcement which basically tossed Harlequin out of the club, decreeing that Harlequin had become a non-eligible publisher and was no longer eligible for RWA-provided conference resources.

Harlequin responded by noting the extent to which its company has supported the RWA and has provided resources to the RWA.  However, because of the furor over the whole business, Harlequin took the unfortunate (and rather cowardly) step of saying it would change the name of its pay-to-play arm and that "Harlequin" would not appear in the name of the new division.

Harlequin didn't cancel the new venture and so far as I have been able to determine, RWA hasn't responded to the name change or welcomed Harlequin back into the fold. 

The whole debacle shows how terrified traditional bastions of publishing are over the future.  Many websites criticized Harlequin by calling it a "vanity press."  Vanity press is a prejudicial and demeaning term that carries a boatload of implied criticism.  The term basically means - or it used to mean - a place an author pays to be published. It was different from a subsidy press, which is one where the author participates in the costs of publication in any manner. The terms were created or endorsed by associations like RWA to differentiate "real authors" from "fake authors."   You're only a real author if you've played their game their way - you queried until you found a "worthy citizen" or agent to sell your work to the Royals in the big publishing castles.  Fake authors are allowed to be members of RWA, and fake publishers can associate with the real authors, but they don't get all the benefits. RWA hopes that because it deigns to allow them to belong to the group, the fake authors and fake publishers will see the error of their ways. 

RWA endorses or advocates only one path to publication - the sacred path.

  ...continue reading "Harlequin’s New Horizon"

I held a Kindle.

Yes, I actually had a real, live, working Kindle in my very own hands. My hands shook, my palms sweated, my fingers gripped it tight, so very, very tight. My brown eyes glistened with lust that turned to love at first grasp. But then came the time of horror, of desolation, of pain. My hubby, my own ever-loving hubby looked at me and said, "You have to give it back now."

My fingers held it tighter and I shook my head no, no, NO. And John said, "It's not yours. You have to give it back." He held out his hands, very carefully, like a cop trying to talk a deranged psycho holding a gun into giving it up. I could have made him fight me for it. I could have forced him to pry it out of my clinging hands. But then, the Kindle might have been hurt. I couldn't hurt the precious little device. So I untangled my fingers, and handed it back.

...continue reading "The Kindle – Love At First Grasp"

My muse is either very fickle or very smart.  Or, perhaps, I'm either exceptionally stubborn or exceptionally stupid.  More likely, it's all of the above.

I had a plan.  I blogged about my plan last time.  I was working on a new historical romance.  Once it was done or (at least) well underway, about the beginning of next year, I was going to stop and do an edit of Griffin's Law.  The next to be published Griffin's is complete and has been resting pending an edit.  Griffin's is a contemporary romance set in a law school and is sort of a crossover between E-mail Enticement and a historical.  Okay - if you insist- think of Griffin's  as the Grey's Anatomy of the legal profession.

Anyway, I've been hard at work writing my new historical.  Rather, I've been trying to be hard at work on the historical.  I've been coming home after work and opening the computer to the MS every night.  I've been opening it faithfully every Saturday and Sunday morning for the past few weekends.  Sometimes, I've even written a few lines on it.  But inevitably, after a line or two, the story leaves me and I start sneaking over to my desktop to play Snood or Solitaire.  Or flipping over to check sales on Amazon, Createspace, Scribd, Smashwords, etc.  Or getting sucked into something on Google News that I keep in customized form as my homepage for Internet Explorer.

...continue reading "Cohorts In Crime"