Skip to content

Each year Britain's Literary Review honors a mainstream author with "The Bad Sex In Fiction Award."   The award goes to writers whose descriptions of sexual antics and activity inspire "eye-rolling and disgust." 

This year, Rowan Somerville won the award for descriptions in his book, "The Shape of Her."  Passages like the following secured him the honor:

Like a lepidopterist mounting a tough-skinned insect with a too blunt pin he screwed himself into her.

As if that wasn't good enough to secure the best of the bad prize, elsewhere in the book Somerville describes a nipple as "the nose of the loveliest nocturnal animal, sniffing in the night."

Some other big literary names were on the list of nominees, including Jonathan Franzen for his book Freedom which included the following passage:

One afternoon, as Connie described it, her excited clitoris grew to be eight inches long, a protruding pencil of tenderness with which she gently parted the lips of his penis and drove herself down to the base of its shaft.  Another day, at her urging, Joey described to her the sleek warm neatness of her turds as they slid from her anus and fell into his open mouth, where, since these were only words, they tasted like excellent, dark chocolate.

Another nominee was Adam Ross for descriptions in his book, Mr. Peanut.  Including a passage where a husband describes his love for his wife's "giganticness" and said if he made love to her from behind he felt like "an X-rated Gulliver among the Brobdingnags."  Ross writes,

She was not his wife but a giant she-creature, an overlarge sex pet:  his to screw, groom and maintain.

In accepting the award, Somerville was gracious and stated that he felt it was fitting because, "There is nothing more English than bad sex."

...continue reading "Bad Sex 2010: Dead Bugs, Pencils & Giant She Creatures"

It's tinfoil hat time again.  I snuck into Mr. Quack's secret room and borrowed one of his.  To get it I had to break the code to unlock the secret box where he stores the alien abduction/blocking government surveillance gear (most of it is multi-purpose).  Chasing the snark I sent him after won't take long, so I better make this post quick.

 For some time I've been checking my book and ebook sales with a fervor and dedication unmatched by most religions.  But as time passes it has perturbed me more and more that so few of those sales are for the paperback versions of my books available through Amazon's Createspace.  I sell a couple of paperbacks a month and that number should be much, much higher. 

CS now distributes paperbacks to other retailers, so my paper books are not just available at Amazon, they're sold at bookstores across the net - from Barnes and Noble to Books a Million and to scores of other retailers.  So the books are out there for purchase in lots of places.  Plus, not everybody owns an ereader (yet) but everybody can read paperpacks.  Everybody has bought paperbacks for years. 

So why is it that my ebooks far, far, FAR outsell the paperbacks?

It's the price.  CS is a POD (print on demand) company.  Under the old system, indie authors had to pay big up front fees and pay to have their books mass produced.  Then they had to market and sell the books themselves.  I understand that Dan Brown used to sell paperbacks out of his automobile trunk.  But under the new POD systems, there are no upfront fees and the company will market and distribute your books if you enroll in the "pro" plan for $39 per year.  So most folks - nearly all indie authors these days - have long ago dumped the old paperback companies and are going with one of the POD companies. 

It's a great idea in theory and it would be a great idea in practice - except for the price structure.  A writer could opt out of the pro plan and put the books up on just Amazon and charge a "fairly" reasonable rate for them.  But everyone wants their books out in more venues.  So we opt into the distribution system.  That comes with big old royalties to Amazon.  Under the structure, a paperback that a writer could buy directly for just over $4 has to be sold for like $16.99 to net a writer $2.75 in royalties.  Ouch. 

And you know what?  $16.99 is a hell of a lot of money to pay for a paperback.  So very few buyers purchase indie paperbacks.  They skim over them and wonder what kind of nut thinks their book is worth that kind of money.  Most probably have a vision of authors expecting the Brinks truck to drive to their house and drop off money.  The big price tag keeps sales of indie paperbacks low.

...continue reading "Is Amazon Feeding The Kindle By Starving Createspace?"

4

Lots of folks have been writing about how great Grey's is this season.  Overall, I tend to agree that the aftermath of Grey's "9/11" has given the writers lots of new directions to explore.  But the ugly specter of one of those new directions reared its charming head in the last episode, "Something's Gotta Give."  After watching the epi and connecting the potential future dots of where it may lead, I'd prefer to rename it - Something's Gotta Go.

What's gotta go?  The specter of Sunshine's Scariest Circle that the writers left dangling in the deviant little brains of some of Grey's longtime fans, like yours truly.  After all, all of the Grey's faithful know that Sunshine likes to draw circles.  She'll show the characters (and us) the other side of some coin by completing an old circle (that viewers didn't realize was incomplete).  Knowing Sunshine's obsession with circles is both a blessing and a curse for fans who get drawn into being armchair quarterbacks.  Lots of those fans are people like me - writers.  It's impossible to keep your mind from writing possible future epis based on what you know of the characters, the show and its creator.   The specter of the possible completion of the circle Sunshine just dangled over our heads is definitely more curse than blessing.  Or perhaps, it's all curse and no blessing. 

...continue reading "Grey’s: Sunshine’s Scariest Circle?"

As I began editing Part 2 of The Duke of Eden,  the book I'm currently putting out as a serial exclusive to Amazon's Kindle, I'm thinking ahead to Part 3 and the overall length of the book.  And I've decided that this time I have a grand ambition - it's going to be a shorter book than the ones I've published previously. 

Why is that such a grand ambition?  Because for writers like me, the ones who get caught up in our own characters and their story, keeping it shorter is much harder than letting it conclude at its own pace.  But I'm gonna try to keep Eden shorter because I've decided that these days, there are a bunch of readers who prefer shorter books.

I was already thinking about this issue a few days ago when I read a post on Dear Author titled "Is Our Attention Span Getting Shorter?"  The author of the post noted that Harlequin category romances had started appearing on the USA Today bestseller list.  As we all know, Harlequins are shorter romances.  Within the Harlequin family of imprints, word counts range range between 50k to 75k, but generally hover between 55k and 65k.  Dear Author noted that one of the things the bestseller list appearances reminded them of was that more shorter books are being sold in the digital age.

Don't get me wrong, I love a good meaty, long ole' historical, but when I read the piece I realized that I've been reading a heck of a lot more Harlequins lately.  I've always enjoyed the books, but I have never bought as many of them as I do now.  Why?  Well, maybe shorter books do read better in an e-world.  You get in, you get the story, and you get out. 

...continue reading "Are Shorter Books Better?"

Unless you serve in our heroic armed forces, being an American is generally more about privilege than price. Today is different. Today is the day we do our job as citizens of the best country in the history of the world.

Today we decide our country's direction by choosing to re-hire the politicians who've been working for us or by letting them go and hiring someone new.

Today is NOT ABOUT your political persuasion. Today is about being an American. GET OUT AND VOTE!!!

1

I haven't joined the Borg.  I have not been assimilated.  Heck, I'm not even a Star Trek fan - though I live with three (3) men who are.  That's why I know about the Borg. Their bloody phrase seeps into dialogue at the Casa de Graham.   I know the phrase.  I know the meaning, but it doesn't fit.  I have NOT been assimilated.  What I've been is the victim of a marketing plan crafted by Mr. Quack, my resident diabolical genius.    

Quacking Alone Romances has had a Facebook page for a few weeks.  It existed and I left it alone.  I operated under the theory that if it didn't bother me and I didn't bother it then we'd both be okay.  Then I started trying to keep this blog refreshed with daily new content - which I thought would be a good thing - by going in each morning and posting a thought for the day.  

Mr. Quack sat me down and told me that I was getting it wrong.  I didn't want to update the blog content everyday, I wanted to put the new stuff on the Facebook page.  He said short thoughts don't belong on the blog, to put that stuff on Facebook.  So, I moved the thought for the day over to the QA Facebook page.  And, I've been trying to keep the page updated with new content by going in and posting my thoughts about books, TV shows, the universe and everything. 

Then Mr. Quack sat me down and said I'd gotten it wrong again.  He said that the Facebook page for QA Romances should stay static and only get updated by blog posts.  He said I needed to work on the Facebook page he'd started for me by reaching out to "friend" folks in my network of family and friends and by posting my thoughts there.  He says that social marketing is a necessary evil. 

Well, I've gone out to FB and put in some of my favorites there and I've started reaching out to "friend" old friends, college and law school buddies and family members. It'll be nice to have a way to stay in touch with them, I suppose.  But I wonder if my youngest son isn't right about Facebook.  Sam says that the number of friends you have on FB isn't about friendship or connecting.  He says it's just a modern day status symbol. 

...continue reading "I Have Not Been Assimilated"

Today will be a brief post.  Blame it on the day job.  You know, the one that pays the bills?  I exist for the day when I can write full time, but this ain't that day (yet).  My boss - the trial lawyer at the firm where I do research and legal writing - is trying a big case next week.  I also have a brief due to the Court of Appeals next Friday so next week promises to be a real ole' humdinger.

Thought I'd post a brief mention about my great experiment on Amazon.  I'm playing with book blurbs or product descriptions again.  Or maybe I should say that I'm playing with book descriptions still.  It's sort of an ongoing battle.   See, my contemporaries - Griffin's Law and E-mail Enticement - haven't yet found their audience.  And I'm convinced that if I describe 'em just right people will check out the sample and then buy the ebooks for their Kindles

Oh, I know, everyone says that nobody reads contemporaries.  Everybody says that contemporary romances don't bloomin' sell as well as historicals unless Oprah picks 'em for her book club or Shonda Rhimes, Ron Howard, or Stephen King or Spielberg (or whoever) buys the movie rights.  I'm still waiting for the call from Oprah or a film mogul.  But despite that, I'm convinced that readers would enjoy the books if they gave 'em a shot.

I've been changing the descriptions of E-mail and Griffin's on sort of an ongoing and manic basis.  (I've been waiting for the guys at Amazon's DTP to call the rubber room police to come get me.)  First, I changed both to add the blog posts describing my process of writing each book.  Nada.  Just, nada.  Then I went back and wrote a pithy, catchy 3 or 4 paragraph description of each. 

You know what happened?  Yep, more Nada. 

...continue reading "Is Less Really More?"