Today will be a brief post. Blame it on the day job. You know, the one that pays the bills? I exist for the day when I can write full time, but this ain't that day (yet). My boss - the trial lawyer at the firm where I do research and legal writing - is trying a big case next week. I also have a brief due to the Court of Appeals next Friday so next week promises to be a real ole' humdinger.
Thought I'd post a brief mention about my great experiment on Amazon. I'm playing with book blurbs or product descriptions again. Or maybe I should say that I'm playing with book descriptions still. It's sort of an ongoing battle. See, my contemporaries - Griffin's Law and E-mail Enticement - haven't yet found their audience. And I'm convinced that if I describe 'em just right people will check out the sample and then buy the ebooks for their Kindles.
Oh, I know, everyone says that nobody reads contemporaries. Everybody says that contemporary romances don't bloomin' sell as well as historicals unless Oprah picks 'em for her book club or Shonda Rhimes, Ron Howard, or Stephen King or Spielberg (or whoever) buys the movie rights. I'm still waiting for the call from Oprah or a film mogul. But despite that, I'm convinced that readers would enjoy the books if they gave 'em a shot.
I've been changing the descriptions of E-mail and Griffin's on sort of an ongoing and manic basis. (I've been waiting for the guys at Amazon's DTP to call the rubber room police to come get me.) First, I changed both to add the blog posts describing my process of writing each book. Nada. Just, nada. Then I went back and wrote a pithy, catchy 3 or 4 paragraph description of each.
You know what happened? Yep, more Nada.

