Skip to content

Konrath Sieges The Castle

Joe Konrath,  author of the Jack Daniels thriller series and of the new resource for indie writers - The Newbies Guide to Publishing - has inked a deal that sieges the Publishing Royals' Castle.  It also charts the course, showing the Royals, authors and agents where the future lies.  The deal itself and the fact that it is with the biggest, baddest ebookseller AND bookseller on the planet has traditional publishing Royals hunkering down in the castle in the futile hope that they can survive the coming indie siege.

Konrath signed a publishing deal with AmazonEncore for the newest JD thriller, Shaken. Under the deal, Shaken will be available in the Kindle store this October and will then be available in print about four months later, in February 2011.   The deal turns the traditional arrangements around 180 degrees and has the Kindle version released first with the print book following several months later.  Some of the Royals have been trying to kill the  upstart ebook industry by releasing their "big" books only in paper form for several months.  That would force loyal fans to buy the paper version and discourage the fans from investing in the future.  Or so the Royals thought and the Royals are used to deciding what we will read, when we will read it and how we will read it. 

The Castle Dwelling Royals, their Acceptable Authors, and many of the Chosen Intermediary literary agents have been particularly disgruntled by this deal.  Why?  Well, first of all, the deal was done with Konrath and his literary agent.  No doubt, the Royals were convinced that the agent should have known better.  See, Konrath had marketed the book to the Royals.  Between his efforts and those of his agent, even if the Royals were too good to bother to Google it for themselves, the Royals were surely advised of Konrath's killer numbers on Kindle for sales of all of his ebooks.  But, as usual, the Royals knew more about what America wanted to read than Americans did, so they rejected the book.  Why would they encourage one of those  people anyway? 

But Amazon is not fettered by the Royal Superiority Complex.  The rebel company offers a platform for all authors to put their work out there and let readers decide for themselves whether or not to hit the buy button.  The Royals (and a few jealous indie competitors) might believe Konrath was inflating his numbers, but Amazon knew better.  And Amazon knows that the digital future is better served by getting it out there electronically first.  So, Konrath and his agent refused to take the Royal NO for an answer and signed on with a company sailing for the future, rather than with one mired in the past.

Konrath's agent deserves some big kudos for having the courage of his or her convictions.  It may have cost the agent a prime parking spot at the Castle, but it very likely will make that agent one of the few that future indie authors want to work with.  It shows that agents who are willing to buck the system will still have a career in a digital future.     

The whole deal has caused an uproar.  Rival thriller author Jason Pinter writes for The Huffington Post and he wrote a piece for them on the deal.  Read the piece.  Pour yourself a big glass of your favorite beverage (Jack Daniels would work fine) and then sit down and read the piece.  The writer telegraphs his position in the first paragraph when he tries to denigrate Konrath based on (his version) of a Twitter exchange.  Then he basically says, how dare Konrath claim to be a great thriller writer when he's never been published by a TRADITIONAL publisher. 

Pinter's whole trajectory in the piece is that the Konrath deal is dangerous because it encourages indie authors and indie publishing.  Pinter thinks Konrath should have known that if the Royals decreed his work wasn't good enough, that meant he should've thrown it in the garbage and written something else.  Pinter clearly drank the Royal's Kool-Aid and now believes that if the Royals say you're not good enough then you're not good enough.  The opinions of all those people around the globe who've hit the buy button to purchase one of Konrath's works on Kindle?  Meaningless.  They're only the intended audience, after all, and the Royals have never catered to such rabble. 

Konrath did a blistering and hilarious rebuttal to the Pinter piece which also ran on HuffPo.  Konrath doesn't descend to the gutter level of Pinter.  Instead of addressing the personalities, he addresses the subject.  As Konrath points out - PRINT IS DEAD.  Or if not already dead, then it is certainly suffering from a terminal illness.  And the industry can't recover until it restructures in a way that recognizes that it has nothing to do with whether a book is good or bad.  Print can't survive until The Royals return the Castle to its rightful owners - the buying public. 

I've not had the success on Amazon or elsewhere that Joe Konrath has, but that doesn't mean that I'll stop trying.  Joe is the embodiment of the American Dream which will never come true for anyone unless the dreamer has American Guts.  He or I or any of the scores of indie writers could've crawled in a hole with our rejection letters in our quivering hands and nursed our wounds until we felt strong enough to try again.  He or I or any indie author could do as Pinter advocates and keep writing until we produce Pablum acceptable enough to the Royals.  In the past, that hole was a writer's only option.

Today, thanks to the valiant efforts of amazing authors like Konrath and of the astonishing and farsighted efforts of the good folks at Amazon (and Smashwords and others) the Royals don't get the final word.  The buyers get the ultimate veto. 

Konrath's siege of the Castle has the Royal minions throwing the only weapons they have left - muck and mud, condescension and innuendo.  But besieging forces captained by indie champions like Konrath have the Castle surrounded.  The Royals are demoralized and hungry and even when they manage to sneak out a communication like Pinter's - it gains them no support.

To Pinter, I'd say -  I'm an indie author and I don't need permission or approval (or anything else) from the Royals. 

To Konrath, I'd say -  Congratulations.  I hope you and your agent and Amazon sell millions of copies and put the final nail in the Royals' coffin. 

I only have one other thing I'd say to Joe Konrath - THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

2 thoughts on “Konrath Sieges The Castle

  1. Jason Pinter

    I'm afraid you misread my article on several fronts:

    --The author I mention in the first paragraph is NOT Konrath, but another author who has not been published traditionally. In fact, I am highly complimentary of both Konrath's ambition and talent, and say as much in the article. I bring up the author (NOT KONRATH) in the first paragraph as an example of someone who, to me, was blaming the establishment for his lack of acclaim rather than looking inward.

    --Konrath's HuffPo piece was NOT a rebuttal to mine. In fact, Joe (aka J.A.) emailed me after my piece ran and said he agreed with many of my points.

    --I am NOT a rival of Joe's in any way. We are in fact friends, and have been on panels together at conferences. We have met many, many times, tipped glasses together, and corresponded on numerous occasions. It is easier to say that he and I are enemies to make your argument, but it simply is not true in any way.

    --I want authors to succeed, in any way, shape or form, and I am a fan of e-publishing. I even released a novella, THE HUNTERS, as an exclusive ebook. The point of my article is that sometimes talent must be nurtured, and sometimes being rejected or facing hardships forces you to work harder. Both myself and Konrath were rejected numerous times before we were ever published, and I think we'd probably agree that it forced us to write better books.

    --I am not a 'Royal', and if you read my other pieces on HuffPo you'd see that I am critical of many aspects of 'traditional' publishing. In no way do I aspire to stifle creativity, if anything I want publishing to more fully embrace the digital revolution.

    I hope this clears up some of your misconceptions. Without any doubt, I want every author to succeed in their career, in whatever way success is defined by them. I do believe that as of right now, for new authors, e-publishing makes it hard to fully develop a career. That's not to say the landscape is not changing (it is), but what worked for Konrath will not necessarily work for everyone at this moment.
    Sincerely,
    Jason Pinter

  2. Mary Anne

    The only author named in the piece was Konrath. Perhaps the Twitter exchange story in your piece would have been clarified if you'd mentioned the other author by name. And yes, that would have given him or her some publicity. Life works that way sometimes. Also, I still feel that a bias against indie or self published authors is what the example in the first paragraph highlights - regardless of how silly it is for any author, self or traditionally published, to battle over exclusion from some list. Lists are often based on opinions and we're all free to have those.

    I'm glad to hear that you and Konrath are friends. I don't know him personally, but I do admire his success and his moxie and I do wish him well. Unfortunately, I did not get the impression from your story that you were friends and I did consider Konrath's story about Print Being Dead to be a response to your piece.

    What I got from your article and still think based on your response is an impression that you believe the publishing elite's opinion to be a standard of some sort. In reality, the readers set the standards and self or indie publishing is the ultimate form of democracy.

    Since publishers make their money from the work of authors, they need to leave their Castle or open the gates so that the work of all receives consideration. Receiving and considering only work presented and pre-screened by Worthy Citizens (agents) means that publishers are building their business on the labor of folks that they refuse to deal with directly. It keeps the Castle Dwellers too far removed from the commoners.

    I'm posting your response with this reply so that if my blog entry misrepresented your views, your response is here for everyone to read. I do appreciate you taking the time to respond and I'm glad to hear that you want all authors to succeed. On that we do agree.

Comments are closed.