<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Quacking Alone &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/index.php/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog</link>
	<description>Reflections by Mary Anne Graham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:59:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>If Michael Jackson Wrote Romance Novels&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2010/06/24/if-michael-jackson-wrote-romance-novels-3/</link>
		<comments>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2010/06/24/if-michael-jackson-wrote-romance-novels-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 22:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Anne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.com/blog/?p=1071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the upcoming anniversary of Michael Jackson&#8217;s passing, I repost the following which originally appeared on the blog shortly after his death.  Okay, get your mind off of all the weirdness of MJ&#8217;s latter years.  As for the criminal charges, don&#8217;t go there.  Think about the music and the performances.  Get yourself in that mind space.  Maybe it&#8217;ll help if [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em>For the upcoming anniversary of Michael Jackson&#8217;s passing, I repost the following which originally appeared on the blog shortly after his death. </em></strong></p>
<p> Okay, get your mind off of all the weirdness of MJ&#8217;s latter years.  As for the criminal charges, don&#8217;t go there.  Think about the music and the performances.  Get yourself in that mind space.  Maybe it&#8217;ll help if you squeal &#8220;Ooh&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;m Bad&#8221; three or four times.  Okay, focused now? </p>
<p> His death was tragic. Having a creative force like his snuffed out so quickly, so needlessly has deprived the world of years of music and magic.  So while it&#8217;s certainly his tragedy, his family&#8217;s tragedy, it&#8217;s also a loss for everyone who ever turned on a radio or downloaded music.  In the wake of the sudden loss there were many retrospectives and tributes.</p>
<p>As one of those tributes Fox re-broadcast the first American Idol finalist show of this season featuring the top 13 performing Michael Jackson songs.  I watch American Idol and enjoy seeing the group working and growing into music professionals.  It&#8217;s always fun to see someone working to make their dream come true.  But I&#8217;d forgotten about that MJ show because, at the time, it was just another show.  Too bad it wasn&#8217;t done later in the season with the gloved one giving the finalists performance critiques and suggestions. </p>
<p><span id="more-1071"></span></p>
<p>My favorite contestant of this past season was Adam Lambert.  We all recall that he finished second.  My only explanation for that is that Kris Allen was everyman &#8212; the one more like the average American watching on the sofa at home.  Adam has too much creative force to be contained or labeled in any one genre or tradition.  Adam will never be anyone&#8217;s everyman &#8212; but neither is Elton John and, of course, neither was Michael Jackson. </p>
<p>As one of the last performances of the show, Adam Lambert did MJ&#8217;s &#8220;Black or White.&#8221;  Adam nailed it, standing out from the others like Sir Elton at a High School talent contest.  His performance impressed the judges too, including Simon Cowell, the one we love to hate and hate to love.  Simon&#8217;s comments made me think and inspired this post.  Simon said Adam nailed it because (and I&#8217;m paraphrasing here because I didn&#8217;t watch the episode with pen in hand) <em>- To make a MJ song work , a performer has to be totally comfortable on stage, and he has to perform the song like Michael &#8211; over the top</em>.</p>
<p>Why did that resonate with me? When Adam and MJ perform, they do it over the top.  When I write romance, I write it over the top.  For a writer or performer to succeed, he or she has to do it the way it comes naturally.  If Kris Allen tried to perform MJ over the top, it wouldn&#8217;t work for him at all.  It worked for Lambert because that&#8217;s how his art speaks to him.  It&#8217;s the same for a romance novelist.  You can only write romance over the top and have it carry the reader along if that&#8217;s how the story and the characters speak to the writer.  I understand MJ&#8217;s approach to music because I know it must have come as naturally to him as my stories come to me. </p>
<p><img title="More..." src="http://quackingalone.com/blog/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="" />I write romance over the top, bigger than life, because that&#8217;s how the characters in my books insist on behaving.  Does my over the top style communicate to readers?  I had a comment on Amazon from a lovely lady who&#8217;d read <em><a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books/#faerie">A Faerie Fated Forever</a></em>.  She said the book was written over the top but she hadn&#8217;t been able to put it down.  Over the top done right will take the reader out of this reality and into one where love is instant, lust is imminent, seduction is inevitable and happily ever after is not just possible and plausable &#8211; it&#8217;s necessary. </p>
<p>With Michael, his song lyrics were intense, almost driven.  His performances took that intensity, that drive, and multiplied them many times over.  The way he acted, sang, danced and performed carried the songs over the top and took his audience along for the ride.  Other artists performing those songs, save for the rare exception like Adam Lambert, generally come off like glass trying to imitate a diamond.  Not many performers, even very polished singers who&#8217;ve sold in the multiple millions, could do Michael and have it come off as a tribute instead of a poor imitation.  I&#8217;d love to see Elton John and Cher performing some Michael Jackson tunes,  separately and together as a duet.  I&#8217;ll bet you a re-fried frog that would be a tribute that carried the soul, the spirit and the vibrance of MJ.</p>
<p>Over the top can, too often, come across as parody.  It will only capture and carry the audience if it first captured and inspired the writer or artist.  As Simon commented on Adam&#8217;s performance, it has to be comfortable before it can be convincing.  When it&#8217;s done right, the view from over the top can change the way readers and audiences view parts of their lives long after the last word or the last note.  Who could experience MJ performing Man In The Mirror without examining their own choices and actions? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll never be the MJ of the literary world.  His shoes are too big, his legacy too inspiring for anyone to attempt to claim.  But if you enjoy MJ&#8217;s music, perhaps you&#8217;d enjoy some of the work of a romance novelist who writes over the top.  <em><a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books/#brotherly">Brotherly Love</a>, <a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books/#faerie">A Faerie Fated Forever</a>, <a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books/#golden">A Golden Forever</a></em>- and my soon to be released <em>A Sixth Sense of Forever</em> are all over the top historicals, and <em><a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books/#email">E-mail Enticement</a></em> is a bigger than life contemporary.  If you enjoy Michael Jackson&#8217;s music, you might find a bit of that same spirit in my writing. </p>
<p>Over the top takes reality to the max.  Then, it takes it further.  It makes extreme seem normal.  In today&#8217;s world where reality is too often bad news, where too many talented folks have lost their livlihoods and must re-invent themselves to survive, over the top can be both inspiration and escape. </p>
<p>Put on a MJ album and pick up an over the top romance and life can look a little brighter, goals can seem more achievable.  If you take it over the top, there is nothing you can&#8217;t do, be or accomplish.  Taking it over the top has never been harder than now when so much negativity and hardship surrounds us all.  Did some of that affect MJ as he rehearsed for his London performances?  Did the thought of trying to carry with him over the top so many folks that were so heavy with loss stress MJ beyond bearing? </p>
<p>Not that there would ever have been a good time, but this was a particularly bad time to lose Michael.  He was an American original and we are lucky that his legacy lives on. </p>
<p>Romance novels weren&#8217;t Michael&#8217;s medium, but if they had been, I think he&#8217;d have written them a lot like mine, but better of course.  If you&#8217;re a MJ fan, you might check out some romance novels that will take you over the top. </p>
<p>Michael Jackson, I thank you for your musical legacy.  It will show many generations to come the view from over the top. MJ, Rest in Peace, at least for a bit, before you get ready for your duet with Elvis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2010/06/24/if-michael-jackson-wrote-romance-novels-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Michael Jackson Wrote Romance Novels</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/12/31/if-michael-jackson-wrote-romance-novels-2/</link>
		<comments>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/12/31/if-michael-jackson-wrote-romance-novels-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 20:22:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Anne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.com/blog/?p=804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[**Originally posted July 5, 2009** Okay, get your mind off of all the weirdness of MJ&#8217;s latter years.  As for the criminal charges, don&#8217;t go there.  Think about the music and the performances.  Get yourself in that mind space.  Maybe it&#8217;ll help if you squeal &#8220;Ooh&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;m Bad&#8221; three or four times.  Okay, focused now?   His [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">**Originally posted July 5, 2009**</span></p>
<p>Okay, get your mind off of all the weirdness of MJ&#8217;s latter years.  As for the criminal charges, don&#8217;t go there.  Think about the music and the performances.  Get yourself in that mind space.  Maybe it&#8217;ll help if you squeal &#8220;Ooh&#8221; and &#8220;I&#8217;m Bad&#8221; three or four times.  Okay, focused now? </p>
<p> His death was tragic. Having a creative force like his snuffed out so quickly, so needlessly has deprived the world of years of music and magic.  So while it&#8217;s certainly his tragedy, his family&#8217;s tragedy, it&#8217;s also a loss for everyone who ever turned on a radio or downloaded music.  In the wake of the sudden loss there were many retrospectives and tributes.</p>
<p>As one of those tributes Fox re-broadcast the first American Idol finalist show of this season featuring the top 13 performing Michael Jackson songs.  I watch American Idol and enjoy seeing the group working and growing into music professionals.  It&#8217;s always fun to see someone working to make their dream come true.  But I&#8217;d forgotten about that MJ show because, at the time, it was just another show.  Too bad it wasn&#8217;t done later in the season with the gloved one giving the finalists performance critiques and suggestions. </p>
<p>My favorite contestant of this past season was Adam Lambert.  We all recall that he finished second.  My only explanation for that is that Kris Allen was everyman &#8212; the one more like the average American watching on the sofa at home.  Adam has too much creative force to be contained or labeled in any one genre or tradition.  Adam will never be anyone&#8217;s everyman &#8212; but neither is Elton John and, of course, neither was Michael Jackson. </p>
<p>As one of the last performances of the show, Adam Lambert did MJ&#8217;s &#8220;Black or White.&#8221;  Adam nailed it, standing out from the others like Sir Elton at a High School talent contest.  His performance impressed the judges too, including Simon Cowell, the one we love to hate and hate to love.  Simon&#8217;s comments made me think and inspired this post.  Simon said Adam nailed it because (and I&#8217;m paraphrasing here because I didn&#8217;t watch the episode with pen in hand) <em>- To make a MJ song work , a performer has to be totally comfortable on stage, and he has to perform the song like Michael &#8211; over the top</em>.</p>
<p>Why did that resonate with me? When Adam and MJ perform, they do it over the top.  When I write romance, I write it over the top.  For a writer or performer to succeed, he or she has to do it the way it comes naturally.  If Kris Allen tried to perform MJ over the top, it wouldn&#8217;t work for him at all.  It worked for Lambert because that&#8217;s how his art speaks to him.  It&#8217;s the same for a romance novelist.  You can only write romance over the top and have it carry the reader along if that&#8217;s how the story and the characters speak to the writer.  I understand MJ&#8217;s approach to music because I know it must have come as naturally to him as my stories come to me. </p>
<p><img title="More..." src="http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="" /><span id="more-804"></span></p>
<p>I write romance over the top, bigger than life, because that&#8217;s how the characters in my books insist on behaving.  Does my over the top style communicate to readers?  I had a comment on Amazon from a lovely lady who&#8217;d read <em><a href="http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/complete-list-of-e-books/#faerie">A Faerie Fated Forever</a></em>.  She said the book was written over the top but she hadn&#8217;t been able to put it down.  Over the top done right will take the reader out of this reality and into one where love is instant, lust is imminent, seduction is inevitable and happily ever after is not just possible and plausable &#8211; it&#8217;s necessary. </p>
<p>With Michael, his song lyrics were intense, almost driven.  His performances took that intensity, that drive, and multiplied them many times over.  The way he acted, sang, danced and performed carried the songs over the top and took his audience along for the ride.  Other artists performing those songs, save for the rare exception like Adam Lambert, generally come off like glass trying to imitate a diamond.  Not many performers, even very polished singers who&#8217;ve sold in the multiple millions, could do Michael and have it come off as a tribute instead of a poor imitation.  I&#8217;d love to see Elton John and Cher performing some Michael Jackson tunes,  separately and together as a duet.  I&#8217;ll bet you a re-fried frog that would be a tribute that carried the soul, the spirit and the vibrance of MJ.</p>
<p>Over the top can, too often, come across as parody.  It will only capture and carry the audience if it first captured and inspired the writer or artist.  As Simon commented on Adam&#8217;s performance, it has to be comfortable before it can be convincing.  When it&#8217;s done right, the view from over the top can change the way readers and audiences view parts of their lives long after the last word or the last note.  Who could experience MJ performing Man In The Mirror without examining their own choices and actions? </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll never be the MJ of the literary world.  His shoes are too big, his legacy too inspiring for anyone to attempt to claim.  But if you enjoy MJ&#8217;s music, perhaps you&#8217;d enjoy some of the work of a romance novelist who writes over the top.  <em><a href="http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/complete-list-of-e-books/#brotherly">Brotherly Love</a>, <a href="http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/complete-list-of-e-books/#faerie">A Faerie Fated Forever</a>, <a href="http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/complete-list-of-e-books/#golden">A Golden Forever</a></em>- and my soon to be released <em>A Sixth Sense of Forever</em> are all over the top historicals, and <em><a href="http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/complete-list-of-e-books/#email">E-mail Enticement</a></em> is a bigger than life contemporary.  If you enjoy Michael Jackson&#8217;s music, you might find a bit of that same spirit in my writing. </p>
<p>Over the top takes reality to the max.  Then, it takes it further.  It makes extreme seem normal.  In today&#8217;s world where reality is too often bad news, where too many talented folks have lost their livlihoods and must re-invent themselves to survive, over the top can be both inspiration and escape. </p>
<p>Put on a MJ album and pick up an over the top romance and life can look a little brighter, goals can seem more achievable.  If you take it over the top, there is nothing you can&#8217;t do, be or accomplish.  Taking it over the top has never been harder than now when so much negativity and hardship surrounds us all.  Did some of that affect MJ as he rehearsed for his London performances?  Did the thought of trying to carry with him over the top so many folks that were so heavy with loss stress MJ beyond bearing? </p>
<p>Not that there would ever have been a good time, but this was a particularly bad time to lose Michael.  He was an American original and we are lucky that his legacy lives on. </p>
<p>Romance novels weren&#8217;t Michael&#8217;s medium, but if they had been, I think he&#8217;d have written them a lot like mine, but better of course.  If you&#8217;re a MJ fan, you might check out some romance novels that will take you over the top. </p>
<p>Michael Jackson, I thank you for your musical legacy.  It will show many generations to come the view from over the top. MJ, Rest in Peace, at least for a bit, before you get ready for your duet with Elvis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/12/31/if-michael-jackson-wrote-romance-novels-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3 Out Of 5 Ain&#8217;t Bad</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/12/22/3-out-of-5-aint-bad-2/</link>
		<comments>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/12/22/3-out-of-5-aint-bad-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 02:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Anne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.com/blog/?p=792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[***Note &#8211; My blog has just been added to my Author Central page at Amazon. To acquaint readers there with my work, I&#8217;m posting some prior entries.  Also, it&#8217;s the holidays, people.  All that peace on earth stuff is stressful and don&#8217;t get me started on the goodwill part.  **** (Originally posted May 31, 2009) Drum roll, please! I got [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>***Note &#8211; My blog has just been added to my Author Central page at Amazon. To acquaint readers there with my work, I&#8217;m posting some prior entries.  Also, it&#8217;s the holidays, people.  All that peace on earth stuff is stressful and don&#8217;t get me started on the goodwill part.  ****</p>
<p>(Originally posted May 31, 2009)</p>
<p>Drum roll, please! I got an actual customer review on Amazon. </p>
<p> A reader gave a brief review of<em> <a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books/#faerie">A Faerie Fated Forever</a></em>. She gave it 3 out of 5 stars, which ain’t bad.  Yeah, 5 out of 5 would’ve been nice but heck, I’m pretty darned new at this whole publication business.  Besides, what has me doing cartwheels isn’t the 3 stars.  It’s what she said about the book.</p>
<p>The reader titled her review <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/R10QJ56Q6DEYZZ/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm">Good Read Overall</a></em>.  She said she started reading and didn’t put it down until the end, but thought there was a bit of over kill when he (Nial) finally decided he was in love.  First and foremost, I write to entertain.  When I pick up a book by one of my long time faves or by a new writer, I know it’s a success if I have trouble putting it down.  If I pick up one and read it straight through – well, that’s a home run.  <em><a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books/#faerie">Faerie</a></em> entertained the reviewer.  That puts a big ole smile on my face.</p>
<p>The reviewer also said she thought there was a bit of “over kill” when Nial acknowledged that he’d fallen in love.  That comment only proves how smart this reviewer must be.  In <em><a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books/#faerie">Faerie</a> </em>as in <a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books">ALL</a> of my books, I write the love story over the top.  There’s a fair amount of tongue in cheek involved in this and it’s certainly not intended to reflect reality.  Anyone who has read this blog knows that I want my readers to escape reality.  And if you’re going to escape this reality, why not write one that women would like to inhabit? </p>
<p><span id="more-285"> </span>My heroes are generally pretty spoiled guys.  Whether it’s in the contemporaries or the historicals, my heroes are rakes and rogues.  They’ve had too much their own way for too long and they’ve devoted a fair amount of energy to pleasure and self indulgence. When love strikes, it hits them hard but they won’t admit it.  They’re too stubborn, too certain that this is just another woman in a long train of women.  By the time they realize this one means much more, that this one matters, they’ve generally screwed up pretty badly.  Then they have to get her back, HAVE TO HAVE HER BACK, can’t live without her.  The race to redeem themselves and win her back is frantic and manic and yeah – totally over the top.  Over kill is a lot of fun to write and, judging from this review, it can be a lot of fun to read.</p>
<p>There’s also some justice that I believe women would like to see more of in the whole process.  Perhaps there’s even an element of Mother Nature’s karma -  You’ve had it way too easy, buddy.  You want this one?  You require this one?  You can’t exist without this one? Well good.  That’s as it should be.  But unlike the rest of your life up to this moment, it won’t be easy.  You’ll have to work to get her and you’ll have to struggle to keep her.  I can hear Mother Nature in my ear as I write, cheering on the heroine <em>- You Go Girl</em>.</p>
<p>I write over the top.  I write “over kill.”  I write stories where a great female <em>karma </em>shifts power to the ladies.   </p>
<p>So if you want to read a “slice of life” story that reflects the world we live in and work in and struggle to pay the bills in, well, my stories may not be your cup of <em>latte.  </em>But if you want to read about a place where men fall head over wonder worm in love, then pick up one of my books.  Heck, pick up <a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books">all of my books</a>.</p>
<p>The Amazon reviewer said she started reading <em><a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books/#faerie">Faerie</a> </em>and did not put it down until the end.  So the review essentially said that <em><a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/complete-list-of-e-books/#faerie">Faerie</a> </em>was an over the top love story that she couldn’t put down.  I like that.  I like it very, very much. </p>
<p>Reader reviews and reaction are important to me.  Yeah, I’d like to be picked up by a big publishing house and have my books in stores around the globe.  Yeah, I’d love to have Shonda Rhimes, Ron Howard, Penny Marshall, Oprah Winfrey or the like call and say <em>- Darling, I must buy the movie rights to your book</em>.   One sale of movie rights would buy me a writer’s life.  Writing full time is the brass ring so many of us dream of reaching.</p>
<p>Most of us will never get the brass ring and it’s not why we write.  We write to intrigue, inform, enlighten or entertain.  For all of us, <em>I couldn’t put it down</em> is the ultimate reader’s compliment.  It’s why we turn on our computers and type <em>Chapter One.  </em>Having this reader say she didn’t put it down until the end means she enjoyed the book.  Having her call Nial’s reaction to falling in love “over kill” means she found it over the top. </p>
<p>To me, the review means I succeeded at least once, with one reader.  Yeah, 5 out of 5 stars would have been nice.  But if I have a choice, I’ll take  “did not put it down until the end” over all the stars in the Amazon universe. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A1E19SJXYSHW6F/ref=cm_cr_rdp_pdp">Tracy Stuber</a>, thanks for taking the time to <a href="http://www.amazon.com/review/R10QJ56Q6DEYZZ/ref=cm_cr_rdp_perm">comment</a> on the book.  It meant a lot to me.  Guess what I’m trying to say is – <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/pdp/profile/A1E19SJXYSHW6F/ref=cm_cr_rdp_pdp">Tracy Stuber</a>, you rock!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/12/22/3-out-of-5-aint-bad-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon Attacks Again &#8211; There&#8217;s A New Publisher In Town</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/12/21/amazon-attacks-again-theres-a-new-publisher-in-town/</link>
		<comments>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/12/21/amazon-attacks-again-theres-a-new-publisher-in-town/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mary Anne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.com/blog/?p=790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THREE CHEERS FOR AMAZON!!! I&#8217;ve given the company a hard time for its failure to clean out its Mobi closet, but people aren&#8217;t perfect so I can hardly expect a company to achieve perfection.  Lord knows, I&#8217;m the poster child for flaws.  So I&#8217;m not saying that Amazon is perfect, but this week it took [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THREE CHEERS FOR AMAZON!!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve given the company a hard time for its failure to clean out its Mobi closet, but people aren&#8217;t perfect so I can hardly expect a company to achieve perfection.  Lord knows, I&#8217;m the poster child for flaws.  So I&#8217;m not saying that Amazon is perfect, but this week it took huge strides in becoming close enough to perfect for me.  Amazon just proved once again that it is the indie writer&#8217;s best friend. </p>
<p>This week, Amazon&#8217;s indie writer&#8217;s subsidiary, CreateSpace, entered the publishing biz.  CS has signed <a href="https://www.createspace.com/en/community/thread/7216?start=0&amp;tstart=0" target="_blank">distribution deals with Ingram&#8217;s Lightning Source and Baker &amp; Taylor</a> which will make books widely available to retailers and bookstores as well as to schools and libraries.  It&#8217;s a big, big deal done quietly, almost under the radar. </p>
<p>This quiet deal promises to change the face of publishing.   </p>
<p><img title="More..." src="http://quackingalone.com/blog/wp-includes/js/tinymce/plugins/wordpress/img/trans.gif" alt="" />Amazon first championed indie writers with its Kindle platform.  Yes, big publishers and major authors &#8211; if they&#8217;re smart &#8211; publish on Kindle.  But the costs of such big named books brings big costs to Amazon as well.  There have been numerous stories speculating that the big e-tailer loses about $2 on each work of a <a href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/">Royal-published</a> author that appears on Kindle.  Invariably those stories reach the flawed conclusion that the weight of these losses will drag down Kindle and Amazon.  Of course, the stories never mention the horde of indie work published on Kindle.</p>
<p>For each indie work, Amazon bears no up-front cost.  The writer sets the purchase price and Amazon collects 65% of that price for each book sold.   And more and more, buyers don&#8217;t care whether the book has been vetted by a big publishing company.  Buyers want to decide for themselves and they&#8217;re starting to hit the buy button more and more often for the indie works.  Each time an indie work sells, the e-tailer and the indie author profit. Big publishing shills cries of bankruptcy ahoy aside, I think Amazon is laughing all the way to the bank.  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s the proof that Amazon is profitting from being the indie advocate?  Why, &#8217;tis this week&#8217;s new deal, of course.  Under the terms, any indie writer published on CS who purchases the pro-plan, at a cost of $39.00 per year, can enter their work in the new distribution channels.  And that&#8217;s the best value out there for indie writers.</p>
<p>Often the cost factor will prevent authors from signing with Lightning Source or Baker &amp; Taylor.  Those distributors require the writer to own the ISBN and then to pay a set up fee.  ISBNs are purchased in a block of 10 for somewhere between $250-$300.  Then there is a set up fee, of say $75, for each book.  That&#8217;s too big a chunk of change for many indie writers, especially in this economy.  Lord knows, I blogged previously about my desire to get my books out there through LS. But in times when my family can&#8217;t pay all its bills, laying out big bucks for distribution of books just wasn&#8217;t happening.</p>
<p>So like many other indie writers, I was anticipating the day when I could get my work out there in the big, wide world.  On that day, my books could sit out there on store shelves beside works of romance authors like Julia Quinn, Johanna Lindsey, Catherine Coulter, Nora Roberts.  And my new books, the contemporaries where love and law intersect, they could one day sit beside John Grisham&#8217;s work.  Heck, my last name (Graham) is even alphabetically close to his.  Well, thanks to Amazon, today is the future.</p>
<p>I was already published through CS and already enrolled in the pro-plan.  So Amazon made the path to my dream as easy as checking a box.  To other indie writers, I&#8217;d note that CS has no set up fees, they provide and own the ISBN, and the pro plan is only $39.00 per year.  For that price, you already got bigger royalties on Amazon.  Today, it also gives you the keys to the world.  Even I can afford $39.00 per year and my current economic balance sheets are as gloomy as anyone&#8217;s. </p>
<p>The move pits Amazon against the traditional publishing companies.  But it doesn&#8217;t do it by attacking the walls of the Royal&#8217;s castles.  Amazon has built a new castle and thrown open the gates.  It doesn&#8217;t set up Amazon or CS as judge and jury.  The companies aren&#8217;t screening works or deciding what Americans want.  Instead, they&#8217;re banking on a future where Americans decide the next big thing for themselves, one purchase at a time. </p>
<p>This move makes Amazon the Ellis Island for indie authors.  The company&#8217;s Kindle success, fueled by profits made more from indies than the establishment, convinced the giant that the huddled masses did yearn to breathe free.  And in freedom, there is both choice and profit.  Our country was built on those principals and when it remembers that America is the country free enterprise built, happy days will return for everyone.  For now, at least Amazon has remembered.</p>
<p>Once again, traditional publishing&#8217;s insular, short-sighted protectionism has brought the Royals a step closer to their own demise.  The companies could have seen the rise of devices like the Kindle as a low cost way to sell more books to more people.  The publishing Royals could have negotiated new  contracts with lower advance money and bigger writer royalties.  That would mean the writers shared not only the risk, but the reward as well.  But of course, publishers didn&#8217;t do that.</p>
<p>Instead, the publishers closed ranks and circled the wagons.  They said, no big discounts to Amazon, never, not in a million years.  In fact, we&#8217;re going to delay the release of new e-books so that we can bank bigger profits on our paper versions.  Take that, Amazon, they cried.</p>
<p>And Amazon took the publisher&#8217;s sword and impaled them on it. </p>
<p>So, book buyers everywhere, keep an eye on the shelves of your favorite bookstore, supermarket or drug store.  Within the next few weeks, if the owners of those stores and markets are smarter than the publishers, those shelves will bloom with books as wide and varied and different as the dreams and personalities of the shoppers. </p>
<p>So once again, Amazon steps forward as the advocate for change and choice and the future.  Maybe an Amazon World wouldn&#8217;t be such a bad place after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/12/21/amazon-attacks-again-theres-a-new-publisher-in-town/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
