Month: March 2012
Grey’s Anatomy: Movin’ On Or Movin’ Out?
As we head closer to season's end on Grey's, my mind naturally turns to the big Elephant on the Grey's landscape - contract renewals. This post will take a minute to share my thoughts about recent episodes like the last one, "One Step Too Far," which was a bombshell. It will also look to see where Shonda Sunshine is heading the characters -- which are movin' on and which are movin' out.
That last new epi - "One Step Too Far" - aired March 15th and the next isn't due until April 5th, so there is time aplenty for the crazy duck lady to ponder where the show is headed and which characters will get off the Grey's train before it pulls into the stations next season. This one let a couple of big shoes drop - surgical trauma caused trouble for Mer/Der and relationship trauma led to a big confession by Owen to Cristina.
Mer/Der had been rocking along very nicely until Shonda Sunshine suddenly made it rain. After choosing to "punish" Mer for helping Adele by switching packets in the clinical trial, last epi Derek decided to switch gears with no warning. Der had banned Mer from his service and essentially from all of neuro and forced her to watch from the sidelines as he brought in Lexie as his new protege. Mer's been floundering - trying to find a new surgical specialty and Lexie's been shining in the McDreamy spotlight, gaining a bit too much confidence in her surgical skills. But it's been a while since Mer's banishment and Lexie's induction, and both ladies were getting used to things. Naturally, Derek had to change that.
Der brought Mer back in for brain surgery on a patient who had a cyst in her temporal lobe that was causing problems. The patient also had a brain tumor which wasn't causing problems so wouldn't be removed in this surgery. While assuring the patient that they'd get the tumor soon, Der made the huge, immense, ginormous mistake of telling the patient that this little ole tumor was gonna be so easy to remove that an intern could handle the procedure. Why was it such a mistake? The intern, Lexie, was listening and she takes every word out of Derek's mouth as gospel so why should she doubt this pronouncement?
So off they go to surgery where Der pushes Lexie out of first chair position and moves Mer back in, leaving Lexie to assist. They get the cyst exposed and Der is called for an emergency on intern Morgan's infant son. Mer and Lexie get the cyst drained only after a little trouble occurs and Mer tells Lexie to open the incision wider. After the cyst drains, both girls see that in the wider surgical field, the tumor they'd been discussing earlier was exposed. And Lexie sees her chance - she can prove to her mentor that she's the best protege and show big sister that little sis has some surgical chops too. But Mer's the senior in the room with Der gone and Lexie can't have her big tumor removing moment unless Mer gives the go ahead. Mer protests and wants to wait but Der doesn't return as quickly as he'd said he would. Eventually Lexie wears her down and Mer consents. She stands by while Lexie slices the tumor out - without either physician consulting any of the brain scans taken earlier.
When the patient awakes, she can't speak normally and she never, ever will. Mer doesn't want to tell Lexie but Der insists and Mer tells Lexie how to handle her hubby. But hubby is still pissed with his wife and he's still grumpy at the scenes at the end of the epi. He's grumpy, but he turns down Mer's offer to leave, which is a good thing. However, we're left with the tension circling their bedroom and we still see trouble ahead. Neuro superstar Derek has been mixing family with business way too much and everyone knows that's never a good thing. Now, the patient will pay the price for Der's idiotic assertion that Lexie could remove the tumor. Der always stews and mopes and lets things build and build to the point where they can only explode, so that's likely what he'll do again. He's also terrible at taking the blame when he sees another candidate handy, and he's decided this one is his wife's fault. Okay, Mer should have said no but she'd been out of the neuro game for a long while and Derek left her in an impossible position. In my field, what Der did would be akin to a Judge leaving a courtroom in the middle of a death penalty trial so that his law clerk was left to finish the trial and pass sentence. Whose fault would that be? The Judge's of course. And whose fault is it that the young patient will never talk normally again? That's right, it's Derek's fault.
Der might be the God of Neuro, but there are other neurosurgeons in the hospital. He shouldn't walk out and leave a resident and an intern alone to finish any brain surgery-- cyst or not. And his tendency to stew and stew before he finally blows up might get him in real trouble this time because Mer might finally be getting tired of playing emotional punching bag for Derek.
Then there's Otina. Cristina's nose for trouble has been sniffing out the suspicion of Owen's having strayed for a few episodes. Things came to a head in this one. Emily, the nurse she's seen Owen flirting with is tasked to help Cristina convince a man to pull the plug on his husband who'd been left brain-dead after a car crash. The nurse is kind and caring but it's Cristina who eventually convinces the man that his soul mate has already gone. After they finish the case, Emily asks Cristina something like - is there anything else I can do - and Cristina says yes, you can stop sleeping with my husband. The nurse says she may have flirted a little with Owen because she flirts with everyone but she's madly in love and has never, ever been unfaithful with Owen or anyone else.
Cristina is still mulling things over when Owen comes home - late again, as has been his slippery pattern of late. She's decided she made too much of nothing and confesses her suspicions to Owen who first tells her that he loves her so much it hurts. That sounds good until Owen corrects himself and says that it hurts to love her. Pow - a punch in the gut - but it gets worse. Owen says he has been unfaithful - but not with Emily.
So who did the dirty deed with Owen? Teddy would be the first guess. She went to war with Owen over the terrible way she found out about her husband's death but she and Owen have a lot of history. And we all remember that there was a time when Owen had to choose between Cristina and Teddy. Could he have decided he made the wrong choice? Don't forget, there was a time when Derek had to choose between Mer and Addison and he chose Addison but he decided that he made the wrong choice. Yet, in a preview for the 4.5 epi, we hear Owen claiming that it was "just sex." It's hard to think he'd feel that way about sex with Teddy, but then again, Owen is a man. So he could think that if comforting Teddy went too far it was "just sex." But we'd know better, right?
If it wasn't Teddy, then who might it have been? Morgan's been crushing on Alex but Owen may have been trying to help her past that or over the problems with her child. Then there's April - the lady Owen gave Chief Resident too, after all. But April's supposedly a virgin so it'd be a little hard-nosed for Owen to call that "just sex" but a man who could backslap his wife the way Owen did on the last epi might be capable of deflowering April and then calling it just sex. Of course, it could be just a random nurse or a stranger he met in a bar - those things happen on Grey's, don't they? Worse - it could've been Lexie. Now wouldn't that be a nice pickle? Yeah, it'd be more like "just sex" because we all know that Lexie loves Mark but at the same time, it'd be much more of a knife in the back. And what if if was Lexie and she gets back together with Mark only to find out that she's pregnant from Owen?
Either way, it appears that Cristina's gonna confide in Mer in the next epi and Mer's going to tell Derek that he'd be in real trouble if he ever cheats on her. And in the clip, Der looks worried. What could that mean? It's possible that Owen has confided in Derek. He may know who Owen did the nasty with - and if so, that would really put Derek in the middle. Of course, Derek deserves to be put in his place a little. His whiny, it's not my fault attitude and his grandiose bragging have earned him some pay back.
But - looking past this epi and the next - where are we with the future of Grey's? If the network doesn't re-sign Mer, Der and Cristina - where does that leave the show? I can see Crinstina possibly leaving. It would be a tough, tough loss -- but I think the show could go on without her. I can even see recent events ultimately making Cristina question whether Owen is her soul mate. If she thinks back on the man and his husband and the trauma she just helped them through, it'd be natural for her to ask that question in the wake of Owen's confession. You know what? I've never thought Owen was Cristina's soul mate. I think that was Burke. So maybe she'd leave the show to go off and explore what future might be open for her with the man who got away.
That would even leave Cardio as a a specialty for Mer, which might turn out to be a nice fit. It'd force her to work with Teddy which could be especially interesting if Teddy turns out to be the one Owen slept with. That would mean that Mer's mentor would be the person who ultimately cost Mer her person. Lot's of interesting possibilities in that, right?
But you know what I find to be the "no future possibilities" scenario? If the produces are stupid enough to let either Mer or Der go -- there goes the show. That's the last call folks - at least it is for the crazy duck lady.
For this romance writer, Grey's without Mer or Der would be like a romance novel that tried continuing after the hero or heroine died. There's no HEA for Grey's if Mer/Der aren't on the show next season. Yes, there's a great ensemble at Grey's - but they're ALL secondary characters. Grey's is the show that Mer/Der built and it can't go on without them.
If the producers don't re-sign Patrick Dempsey and Ellen Pompeo, in my opinion, they're signing Grey's death warrant. Yes, they're killing the goose that laid their very own golden egg. Grey's without Mer/Der is like a romance novel without the hero and the heroine - it'd be a mighty sad place.
The last episode for Mer or Der would be the last episode of Grey's Anatomy most of America would watch -- and that includes a certain over-the-top duck lady.
UPDATE: Welcome Twitter, Facebook, and FanForum visitors! Take a look at my tribute to Grey's, Dangerous Relations: Griffin's Law! The synopsis and purchase buttons are at the preceding link, and Amazon has graciously provided a "read the first paragraphs" link; check it out!
Say It Ain’t So – A DNF Lowell?
For my February Prime borrow on Kindle I picked up Elizabeth Lowell's, "Golden Mountain." It now appears to be free, so you might want to pick it up and give it a read. Your opinion could certainly vary from that of a crazy duck lady, because IMHO - this is one to pass on. And I can't believe I said that about a Lowell romance!
I love every Lowell book I've ever read with the exception of this one. Ms. Lowell is an amazingly talented author, but this book just didn't do it for me. I couldn't finish it. I read about 10 to 15% of the book before I put it away. I only read that much because it was a Lowell so I kept waiting for it to pick me up and get me involved. Except that never happened. Not only did I not get involved, I dreaded picking up my Fire and would make excuses why I couldn't read more just now. That's when I knew that I had to let this one go because normally I steal time from writing to read. I was a romance fan a long time before I was a romance author, after all.
Why didn't I like this one? First, it took way too long to get started. The first part was the heroine following her father around and assisting him while he took photos of Chinese miners and mining communities. When the father died - very early in the book (not a *spoiler*) - the heroine wandered off to Seattle to take photos. Then we're treated to long, expansive descriptions of the Chinese community in Seattle. By the time I put it down the story seemed almost ready to go somewhere, but by then I didn't care. In a romance, I want to feel tension between the hero and the heroine fairly quickly. I'm okay with a few pages of backstory, but get me involved first, then feed me the history.
My other big problem with this book was that it wasn't clear from the get go who the hero was. There were 2 brothers - one good guy and one wild one. It seemed that the good guy would be the hero, but the first chemistry we read about occurs between the heroine and the wild brother. I wasn't even sure if the good guy could be the hero because there was a reference to the good guy having slept with the heroine's newly discovered step-mother, a prostitute for one of the Chinese crime lord big shots we read far too much about. That made me feel icky about the good guy brother. Of course the good guy could have turned out to be the bad guy and the wild one could have been the real good guy.
My biggest problem with the book was that the lack of clarity about the hero made me feel unsure of the story. I'm okay with a hero that starts out with issues. I'm okay if he is the biggest rogue in the galaxy. I know that once he meets the heroine, he'll change. Oh, he'll be unwilling to change and perturbed with the world at large because he is changing. But by the end of the story, I'll have been with him through his changes and I'll adore him. But that can only happen if I'm clear that I should be rooting for him instead of finding him annoying.
I hate romances where the heroine is torn between two men. Or at least, I generally hate them. I recall that "Whitney, My Love" was an exception to that rule. Golden Mountain could have been an exception too - it should have been, because it was written by Lowell. The difference between Whitney and Golden is that we knew who the hero and heroine were in Whitney and we saw chemistry between the hero and heroine early on - even if the heroine didn't see it yet.
I guess Elizabeth Lowell can't be perfect every time. So she's only "almost" perfect. If I ever achieve "almost" perfect I'll rent out an airplane and skywrite it. I'll buy TV time and advertise it. But I won't start budgeting for that just yet...
If I were you, I'd give "Golden Mountain" a pass and pick up Lowell's "Only" books instead. I got them while they were $1.99. Of course, they're old favorites but now they have space on my Fire. It looks like HarperCollins is running "rolling" $1.99 specials on a bunch of Ms. Lowell's work. Trust me, pick those up and pass on "Golden Mountain."
‘Tis The Day To Waddle Over to ADAN
Tis the day of the month when y'all need to waddle over to ADAN and check out my blog post.
Our theme this month is beginnings and my post is about my beginning as a romance writer.
Waddle on over and be sure to leave me a quack out in the comments!
Ma Book Should Go The Way Of Ma Bell
Today news broke that the Justice Department warned Apple and a number of big publishers of its intent to file suit against them. The DOJ alleges that Apple and the publishers conspired to increase the price of ebooks. Publishers affected apparently include the following:
The five publishers facing possible Justice Department action are Simon & Schuster Inc, a unit of CBS Corp (CBS.N); Lagardere SCA's (LAGA.PA) Hachette Book Group; Pearson Plc's (PSON.L) Penguin Group (USA); Macmillan, a unit of Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck GmbH; and HarperCollins Publishers Inc, a unit of News Corp (NWSA.O). -- Reuters
If DOJ wants confirmation, it might check with consumers, particularly those who owned Kindles and bought them based upon Amazon's promise to try to keep ebook prices below $9.99. Yes, Virginia the roosters coming home to roost this time arise from the publisher's battle with Amazon over ebook pricing that resulted in publishers and Apple concocting the "agency model" of pricing. What is the agency model? It's where the publisher decides what its price will be and the retailer is not allowed to change it.
Think of the agency model like this (and this is only an example, based on nothing more than the odd imagination of a certain duck lady) - imagine that Wrangler is really peeved at Wal Mart for selling its blue jeans for $19.99. Wrangler has decided it wants it's blue jeans to have an upscale image and a price tag to match. Wrangler decides that Wal Mart can only sell its jeans if they are priced at the numbers on the tags shipped with the jeans and they start at $49.95 a pair. If Wal Mart doesn't like it, then they can't sell Wrangler jeans.
Well, that wouldn't work if just Wrangler did it, now, would it? Wal Mart would say to Wrangler - screw you and the horse you rode in on. Where will you sell your jeans with those terms, Wal Mart would ask. The store that Sam Walton built might reply that it would just sell Levis instead. But what if 5 or 6 big companies control all the well known jean brands? And what if all of them say the same thing to the big chain store? And when the chain store asks, in a much softer voice, well, where will you sell your product, then - who will ever accept those terms? And the merchants answer - Target. We've all reached a deal with Target on exactly those terms and Target will keep a set percentage for profit based on the price we set. Well, Target would be making a chunk of change too, wouldn't it? And Wal Mart would lose all the customers who wanted to buy big name jeans. AND, worst of all, the customers would pay a lot more for the product.
Now, understand that the big publishers are the blue jean companies and Apple is Target. That's agency pricing and in the long run, the victims are the consumers.
Federal Antitrust legislation exists to prevent monopolies that destroy competition and damage consumers. The most famous example of DOJ's heavy hand with Antitrust action was the break up of the old Ma Bell network of AT&T. Since that time - look at what's happened to telephone service. Consumers have options at every price point and every service level. And as much as I dislike the Feds regulating most things, Antitrust legislation has an important and valuable purpose.
So, DOJ may very well be right on target in breaking up this scheme because prices consumers pay should be set by the merchants from whom consumers buy. The merchants pay a wholesale price and sometimes they'll sell some items below wholesale in order to promote some other items. That's what Amazon was doing with ebooks to sell its Kindle devices - and again, that's what publishers were trying to prevent.
Yes, if agency pricing goes then the whole system will have to adjust. Indies like me would be hurt because we are little tiny pebbles caught between giant boulders. Amazon says to indies, you can only sell on our platform if you price you ebooks at your cheapest price. Oh, and if your price is lower anywhere else - we'll match the low price and base your royalty payment on that figure. Presently, the agency pricing system gave indies got a benefit of sales platforms mostly selling indie work at the price the indies set. So indies don't get caught in a price reduction whirlwind at Amazon, often the biggest sales source.
Even though readjusting the system to get it back to a wholesale/retail marketplace would hurt indies, like me, for a while, I expect that pricing would work itself out after a period of some turbulence. And even if it didn't, and I took a hit along with other indies, well, that's okay. We'd have to adapt because ultimately, the agency pricing results in readers paying high prices across the board when in a wholesale/retail market, competition would keep prices lower. READERS SHOULD NEVER BE HURT BY AND OVERCHARGED BECAUSE OF A "SECRET" SYSTEM THAT'S KEEPING PRICES ARTIFICIALLY INFLATED.
It's not something I say often but in this case, I've gotta make an exception - YOU GO, DOJ. Ma Book should go the way of Ma Bell.
Don’t Miss The Steals & Deals – Smashwords Read An Ebook Sale Runs Through March 10th
Don't miss out on the Smashwords Read An Ebook week promo. It runs through this Saturday, March 10th.
There are steals and deals galore so don't miss out on this once-a-year chance to fill your ereader without draining your wallet. It's a coupon sale, so enter the codes at check out.
ALL QUACKING ALONE ROMANCES ARE 50% OFF ! If you don't own 'em all already - perhaps you haven't picked up one or two of them yet - then don't miss these deals.
With the strained state of finances and the need to stretch a dollar until old George Washington quacks for help - I never miss this deal and you shouldn't either. So waddle on over to SW and fill up your ereader before the stroke of midnight on Saturday, March 10th.
My Answer – The Atlantic Wonders If Publishers Should Worry
Alan Jacobs of The Atlantic posted a piece entitled: Digital Self-Publishing: Should Publishers Be Worried? In the article, he says: "John O'Hara, who long ago wrote the book for the musical Pal Joey, based on his own novel. When the play was making a big run on Broadway, two friends of O'Hara's bumped into him on the streets of New York. "Oh John," they cooed, "We just saw Pal Joey again, and we enjoyed it even more than the first time!" O'Hara snarled, "What the hell was wrong with it the first time?""
Jacobs' piece also quotes Colorado College's librarian Steve Lawson's Piece. Lawson's article is entitled: Publishers Hate You. You Should Hate Them Back. Lawson says:
So library-types, let’s get our story straight. Publishers have contempt for the authors they need to write works, and the readers they need to read works. Publishers are scared that the internet is going to disintermediate their asses into the dustbin of history, and the best response that many of them have come up with is to express their fear through hatred. For all the things that we might need to improve in libraries or apologize for, this isn’t one of them.
Jacobs reply is basically as follows, although you should read the whole piece:
But one of the illusions most common to writers -- an illusion that may make the long slow slog of writing possible, for many people -- is that an enormous audience is out there waiting for the wisdom and delight that I alone can provide, and that the Publishing System is a giant obstacle to my reaching those people. Thus the dream that digital publishing technologies will indeed "disintermediate" -- will eliminate that obstacle and connect me directly to what Bugs Bunny calls "me Public." (See "Bully for Bugs".) And we have heard just enough unexpected success stories to keep that dream alive.
Well, here's hoping. But a couple of months ago I decided to dip my toes into these waters: I wrote a longish essay called "Reverting to Type" about my own history as a reader -- a kind of personal epilogue to The Pleasures of Reading -- and decided to submit it as a Kindle Single. Amazon wasn't interested, so I decided to publish it myself using Kindle Direct Publishing. I announced its existence to the world: that is, I posted a link on my tumblelog and tweeted about it. A few people downloaded it; some pointed out typos that I had missed, but that a copy editor surely would have caught. I thought about ways to promote it better but haven't been able to come up with anything other than becoming a self-promoting jerk on Twitter. Last time I checked it had sold 98 copies
MY ANSWER?
I'm an indie author who distributes through Smashwords, KDP, Pubit for B&N and most recently, All Romance eBooks. My books sit on the virtual shelves beside great work published by big companies and indie authors alike. For whatever it's worth, I've sold a lot more than 98 copies of my work - I don't have the number but I've sold thousands. I've (probably - haven't totaled them) sold at least 98 so far this month across the channels and it's only 4 days into March. And NO, my numbers don't IN ANY WAY even begin to compare to some of the success stories, like Amanda Hocking's for example. All in all, self publishing is a lot of work, but the rewards are amazing. Some of the reward is monetary - extra money to supplement yet another family struggling in this economy. Much of the reward is simply having my work out there to be loved and hated - and yes, it has received both responses.
When I started self publishing I wrote long blogs about how companies like Smashwords would break through and destroy the walls of the publishing royals castles. I continue to think that self publishing has greatly, greatly enriched the literary world and, more importantly, that it has empowered the reader to decide whether or not the work is worth her money. No longer do the publishing companies' systems and slush piles serve as socially acceptable censors.
Now, however, I'm farther along on my journey and my attitude has changed slightly. Yes, I think self publishing has already destroyed the castle walls so that all writers can get their work to readers. Yes, work from the big companies usually - but not always - sells better, but the market share of those companies will go the way of the castle walls. I think we're headed for greater equality which is always a good thing.
I believe that publishing companies who change the way they do business can adapt, survive and succeed. I believe that they will have to adopt an Amazon approach and partner with writers, showing a willingness to throw out the old models and craft individual deals that recognize writers as important business partners with individual needs and concerns. I don't think publishing will survive in any kind of "one size fits all" way.
In the long run, I hope that publishers do adapt to the digital world. I've read many great published books and hope to read many more. Today, I've come far enough along my journey to wish publishers who adapt and change - and especially the writers who partner with them - great success.