<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Smash It Again, Mark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://quackingalone.com/blog/index.php/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/</link>
	<description>Reflections by Mary Anne Graham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon Attacks Again &#8211; There&#8217;s A New Publisher In Town &#187; Quacking Alone</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon Attacks Again &#8211; There&#8217;s A New Publisher In Town &#187; Quacking Alone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 12:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] have been numerous stories speculating that the big e-tailer loses about $2 on each work of a Royal-published author that appears on Kindle.  Invariably those stories reach the flawed conclusion that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been numerous stories speculating that the big e-tailer loses about $2 on each work of a Royal-published author that appears on Kindle.  Invariably those stories reach the flawed conclusion that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon Attacks Again &#8211; There&#8217;s A New Publisher On The Block &#187; Quacking Alone</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon Attacks Again &#8211; There&#8217;s A New Publisher On The Block &#187; Quacking Alone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] have been numerous stories speculating that the big e-tailer loses about $2 on each work of a Royal-published author that appears on Kindle.  Invariably those stories reach the flawed conclusion that the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been numerous stories speculating that the big e-tailer loses about $2 on each work of a Royal-published author that appears on Kindle.  Invariably those stories reach the flawed conclusion that the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JimmyBean</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>JimmyBean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know If I said it already but ...Cool site, love the info.  I do a lot of research online on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I&#039;m glad I found your blog.  Thanks, :)

A definite great read..Jim Bean</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know If I said it already but &#8230;Cool site, love the info.  I do a lot of research online on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say I&#8217;m glad I found your blog.  Thanks, <img src='http://quackingalone.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>A definite great read..Jim Bean</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tnelson</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Tnelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I usually don’t post on Blogs but ya forced me to, great info.. excellent! … I&#039;ll add a backlink and bookmark your site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I usually don’t post on Blogs but ya forced me to, great info.. excellent! … I&#8217;ll add a backlink and bookmark your site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. B. Story</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>D. B. Story</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 17:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Loved your saga since this is how this commoner has also successfully stormed the merchant prince retailers.  I only found a couple places to add comments.

After several years of writing material that was probably just a little too much age 18+ for publication (mostly written out of frustration at the overly sanitized versions that were the only things allowed by the gatekeepers to the royals) I found a small publisher who gets my work on SmashWords, MobiPocket, FW, B&amp;N, and of course, Amazon.  And they use CreateSpace for print as well as everything being eBook. So I heartily second your narrative as 21st century publishing not being your grandfather&#039;s Oldsmobile.

The one thing missing from your history is how the Internet spawned free and paid for story sites (first Usenet, then StoriesOnline, Literotica, Ellora&#039;s Cave, and many others) that incubated writers while providing fiction -- some great, some pretty bad -- that would never be published in print by any established imprint -- yet were stories many people have enjoyed reading. These sites allowed readers to vote and give feedback to authors to improve the genre and help hone writing skills, and are -- I feel -- an important element to what came next. In these sites you can find a profusion of stories you&#039;d never have had a chance to read otherwise because of the high cost of Vanity Press, and they&#039;re coded for content by their authors and rated by your fellow readers to help you make your choices.  There is already more free reading material out there right now from these sources than most of us could read in the rest of our lives. This helped new authors to realize that their work was worthy of publishing once the opportunity of low risk/low cost entry to the book market became available.

As far as this author is concerned, the established publishing houses and their gatekeepers can either evolve into the new market, or go the way of the buggy whip makers. My publisher operates under the new, and no doubt very scary, model to the established houses of returning 100% of its royalties to its authors.  It utilizes other methods to cover its relatively low overhead costs.

I now have 11 titles up on the big retailers, with more to come soon. Prior to this revolution I had zero.

Thanks for a good read here today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved your saga since this is how this commoner has also successfully stormed the merchant prince retailers.  I only found a couple places to add comments.</p>
<p>After several years of writing material that was probably just a little too much age 18+ for publication (mostly written out of frustration at the overly sanitized versions that were the only things allowed by the gatekeepers to the royals) I found a small publisher who gets my work on SmashWords, MobiPocket, FW, B&amp;N, and of course, Amazon.  And they use CreateSpace for print as well as everything being eBook. So I heartily second your narrative as 21st century publishing not being your grandfather&#8217;s Oldsmobile.</p>
<p>The one thing missing from your history is how the Internet spawned free and paid for story sites (first Usenet, then StoriesOnline, Literotica, Ellora&#8217;s Cave, and many others) that incubated writers while providing fiction &#8212; some great, some pretty bad &#8212; that would never be published in print by any established imprint &#8212; yet were stories many people have enjoyed reading. These sites allowed readers to vote and give feedback to authors to improve the genre and help hone writing skills, and are &#8212; I feel &#8212; an important element to what came next. In these sites you can find a profusion of stories you&#8217;d never have had a chance to read otherwise because of the high cost of Vanity Press, and they&#8217;re coded for content by their authors and rated by your fellow readers to help you make your choices.  There is already more free reading material out there right now from these sources than most of us could read in the rest of our lives. This helped new authors to realize that their work was worthy of publishing once the opportunity of low risk/low cost entry to the book market became available.</p>
<p>As far as this author is concerned, the established publishing houses and their gatekeepers can either evolve into the new market, or go the way of the buggy whip makers. My publisher operates under the new, and no doubt very scary, model to the established houses of returning 100% of its royalties to its authors.  It utilizes other methods to cover its relatively low overhead costs.</p>
<p>I now have 11 titles up on the big retailers, with more to come soon. Prior to this revolution I had zero.</p>
<p>Thanks for a good read here today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 06:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Love the story.  Just discovered SmashWords today.  I needed both inputs–there are no mistakes in life!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the story.  Just discovered SmashWords today.  I needed both inputs–there are no mistakes in life!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Trackbacks for Smash It Again, Mark « Quacking Alone [quackingalone.wordpress.com] on Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Trackbacks for Smash It Again, Mark « Quacking Alone [quackingalone.wordpress.com] on Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 04:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] Smash It Again, Mark « Quacking Alone  quackingalone.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark &#8211; view page &#8211; cached  #RSS 2.0 Quacking Alone » Smash It Again, Mark Comments Feed Quacking Alone Amazon Kindles Possibilities Latest Website Changes – Covers &amp; Categories &#8212; From the page [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Smash It Again, Mark « Quacking Alone  quackingalone.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark &ndash; view page &ndash; cached  #RSS 2.0 Quacking Alone » Smash It Again, Mark Comments Feed Quacking Alone Amazon Kindles Possibilities Latest Website Changes – Covers &amp; Categories &mdash; From the page [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitted by bookobot</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by bookobot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-20</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by bookobot [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by bookobot [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shayne Parkinson</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Shayne Parkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 22:14:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Yes! Hurrah for Sir Mark and for Smashwords!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! Hurrah for Sir Mark and for Smashwords!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sheilaokelly</title>
		<link>http://quackingalone.com/blog/2009/09/06/smash-it-again-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>sheilaokelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 21:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://quackingalone.wordpress.com/?p=525#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Three cheers to SmashWords. I am another of the commoners who has just been shipped to Barnes and Noble and Fictionwise. My contribution is Love Knot by Sheila O&#039;Kelly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three cheers to SmashWords. I am another of the commoners who has just been shipped to Barnes and Noble and Fictionwise. My contribution is Love Knot by Sheila O&#8217;Kelly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
